- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 30.85 vs KX-TU250
alcatel 30.85 vs Panasonic KX-TU250
What 30.85 does better (2) and where KX-TU250 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
30.85KX-TU250
| 30.85 | KX-TU250 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 118 mm | 127 mm | −9 mm |
| Width | 59.8 mm | 52 mm | +7.8 mm |
| Thickness | 13.6 mm | 15 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Weight | 113 g | 106 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 30.85 better than KX-TU250?
- Battery capacity1,850 mAh vs 1,500 mAh+23%
- Thickness13.6 mm vs 15 mm+10%
Why is KX-TU250 better than 30.85?
- Main camera0.3 MP vs 1 MP4×
- Weight113 g vs 106 g+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 113 g | 106 g |
| Thickness | 13.6 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 118 mm | 127 mm |
| Width | 59.8 mm | 52 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | Farb-Display | Farb-Display |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 167 ppi |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 27% |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | 1 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,850 mAh | 1,500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
