- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 30.85 vs 215 4G
alcatel 30.85 vs Nokia 215 4G
What 30.85 does better (1) and where 215 4G wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
30.85215 4G
| 30.85 | 215 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 118 mm | 124.7 mm | −6.7 mm |
| Width | 59.8 mm | 51 mm | +8.8 mm |
| Thickness | 13.6 mm | 13.7 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 113 g | 90 g | +23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 30.85 better than 215 4G?
- Battery capacity1,850 mAh vs 1,150 mAh+61%
Why is 215 4G better than 30.85?
- Weight113 g vs 90 g+25%
- Dual SIMNo · 30.85: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 113 g | 90 g |
| Thickness | 13.6 mm | 13.7 mm |
| Height | 118 mm | 124.7 mm |
| Width | 59.8 mm | 51 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black, Cyan Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | Farb-Display | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 28% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Unisoc UMS9117 |
| Chip maker | — | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.062 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,850 mAh | 1,150 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | — | microUSB 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.63 W/kg |
