- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 30.85 vs C200 Comfort 4G
alcatel 30.85 vs Funker C200 Comfort 4G
What 30.85 does better (3) and where C200 Comfort 4G wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.0Camera3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
30.85C200 Comfort 4G
| 30.85 | C200 Comfort 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 118 mm | 105 mm | +13 mm |
| Width | 59.8 mm | 52 mm | +7.8 mm |
| Thickness | 13.6 mm | 21.3 mm | −7.7 mm |
| Weight | 113 g | 128 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 30.85 better than C200 Comfort 4G?
- Battery capacity1,850 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+85%
- Weight113 g vs 128 g+13%
- Thickness13.6 mm vs 21.3 mm+57%
Why is C200 Comfort 4G better than 30.85?
C200 Comfort 4G has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 113 g | 128 g |
| Thickness | 13.6 mm | 21.3 mm |
| Height | 118 mm | 105 mm |
| Width | 59.8 mm | 52 mm |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | Farb-Display | TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | 0.3 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,850 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
