How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. M9F Floating vs Armor Mini 4

AGM M9F Floating vs UleFone Armor Mini 4

What M9F Floating does better (2) and where Armor Mini 4 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

AGM M9F Floating
AGM · 2024M9F Floating
4.4Score
2 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
vs
UleFone Armor Mini 4
UleFone · 2025Armor Mini 4
3.9Score
3 advantages≈ $65
3.1Camera3.1
2.0Battery2.0
5.7Features5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

M9F FloatingArmor Mini 4
59 × 141.316.563 × 142.915
M9F FloatingArmor Mini 4Difference
Height141.3 mm142.9 mm−1.6 mm
Width59 mm63 mm−4 mm
Thickness16.5 mm15 mm+1.5 mm
Weight126 g150 g−24 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is M9F Floating better than Armor Mini 4?

  1. Bluetooth5 vs 2.42.1×
  2. Weight126 g vs 150 g+19%

Why is Armor Mini 4 better than M9F Floating?

  1. Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 2,100 mAh2.1×
  2. Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
  3. Thickness16.5 mm vs 15 mm+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight126 g150 g
Thickness16.5 mm15 mm
Height141.3 mm142.9 mm
Width59 mm63 mm
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
ColoursYellow, BlackBlack
Display
Screen size2.4″2.8″
PanelFarb-DisplayTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density—143 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio—27%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T107Unisoc T117
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
Memory
RAM—0.062 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera2 MP2 MP
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity1,000 mAh2,100 mAh
Battery type—Li-Ion
Wired charging—5 W
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNo—
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth52.4
NFC—No
USB—USB Type-C
Features
Stereo speakers—No
3.5 mm headphone jack—Yes
Sensors—No
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare