How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. M9F Floating vs XP100

AGM M9F Floating vs Sonim XP100

What M9F Floating does better (1) and where XP100 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

AGM M9F Floating
AGM · 2024M9F Floating
4.4Score
1 advantage≈ $65
Higher score
vs
Sonim XP100
Sonim · 2024XP100
3.9Score
1 advantage≈ $70
3.1Camera3.1
2.0Battery2.1
5.7Features4.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

M9F FloatingXP100
59 × 141.316.562 × 14516.2
M9F FloatingXP100Difference
Height141.3 mm145 mm−3.7 mm
Width59 mm62 mm−3 mm
Thickness16.5 mm16.2 mm+0.3 mm
Weight126 g165 g−39 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is M9F Floating better than XP100?

  1. Weight126 g vs 165 g+31%

Why is XP100 better than M9F Floating?

  1. Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,800 mAh+80%
Specifications

Side by side

Sonim XP100Sonim XP100≈ $703.9
Design
Weight126 g165 g
Thickness16.5 mm16.2 mm
Height141.3 mm145 mm
Width59 mm62 mm
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass
ColoursYellow, BlackBlack
Display
Screen size2.4″2.4″
PanelFarb-DisplayTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density—167 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio—19.8%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T107Unisoc T127
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
CPU cores—1
CPU frequency—1 GHz
Memory
RAM—0.062 GB
Storage (max)—128 GB
Storage (base)—128 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera2 MP2 MP
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity1,000 mAh1,800 mAh
Battery type—Li-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth55
NFC—No
USB—USB Type-C 2.0
USB version—2
Features
Stereo speakers—No
3.5 mm headphone jack—Yes
Sensors—No
Software
OS at launch—Mocor OS
Platform—Other
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare