How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. M9F Floating vs E246SC

AGM M9F Floating vs Energizer E246SC

What M9F Floating does better (1) and where E246SC wins (1) — every spec side by side.

AGM M9F Floating
AGM · 2024M9F Floating
4.4Score
1 advantage≈ $65
Higher score
vs
Energizer E246SC
Energizer · 2024E246SC
1 advantage≈ $55
Dimensions

Size comparison

M9F FloatingE246SC
59 × 141.316.570 × 8621
M9F FloatingE246SCDifference
Height141.3 mm86 mm+55.3 mm
Width59 mm70 mm−11 mm
Thickness16.5 mm21 mm−4.5 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is M9F Floating better than E246SC?

  1. Thickness16.5 mm vs 21 mm+27%

Why is E246SC better than M9F Floating?

  1. Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 2,000 mAh2×
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight126 g—
Thickness16.5 mm21 mm
Height141.3 mm86 mm
Width59 mm70 mm
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
ColoursYellow, BlackGray
Display
Screen size2.4″2.4″
PanelFarb-DisplayTN TFT
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density—167 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio—29.6%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T107Unisoc T107
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
Process—22 nm
CPU cores—1
CPU frequency—1 GHz
Memory
RAM—0.047 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera2 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Telephoto cameraNo—
4K selfie video—No
Battery
Battery capacity1,000 mAh2,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Ion
Wireless chargingNo—
Connectivity
5GNo—
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth55
NFC—No
USB—USB Type-C 2.0
USB version—2
Features
Stereo speakers—No
3.5 mm headphone jack—Yes
Sensors—No
Software
OS at launch—Proprietary OS
Platform—Other
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare