- dotrising.com
- Compare
- M9F Floating vs Leva E10
AGM M9F Floating vs Doro Leva E10
What M9F Floating does better (2) and where Leva E10 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Camera3.1
2.0Battery2.0
5.7Features3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
M9F FloatingLeva E10
| M9F Floating | Leva E10 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 141.3 mm | 128 mm | +13.3 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 67.6 mm | −8.6 mm |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 12.7 mm | +3.8 mm |
| Weight | 126 g | 119 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M9F Floating better than Leva E10?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Dual SIMYes · Leva E10: No
Why is Leva E10 better than M9F Floating?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,150 mAh+15%
- Weight126 g vs 119 g+6%
- Thickness16.5 mm vs 12.7 mm+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 126 g | 119 g |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 12.7 mm |
| Height | 141.3 mm | 128 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 67.6 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Yellow, Black | Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | Farb-Display | TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 167 ppi |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 20.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | Unisoc T127 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| CPU cores | — | 1 |
| CPU frequency | — | 1 GHz |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,150 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Mocor RTOS |
| Platform | — | Other |
| Interface | — | Mocor OS |
