- dotrising.com
- Compare
- M9 vs KX-TU250
AGM M9 vs Panasonic KX-TU250
What M9 does better (1) and where KX-TU250 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
M9KX-TU250
| M9 | KX-TU250 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 141.3 mm | 127 mm | +14.3 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 52 mm | +7 mm |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 15 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Weight | 131 g | 106 g | +25 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M9 better than KX-TU250?
- Dual SIMYes · KX-TU250: No
Why is KX-TU250 better than M9?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,500 mAh+50%
- Weight131 g vs 106 g+24%
- Screen-to-body ratio21.4% vs 27%+26%
- Thickness16.5 mm vs 15 mm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 131 g | 106 g |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 141.3 mm | 127 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 52 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT | Farb-Display |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 21.4% | 27% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | — |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | — |
| CPU cores | 1 | — |
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 1 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | ThreadX | — |
| Platform | Other | — |
