- dotrising.com
- Compare
- M9 vs 5310 (2024)
AGM M9 vs Nokia 5310 (2024)
What M9 does better (1) and where 5310 (2024) wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Display2.1
2.0Battery2.1
7.0Features3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
M95310 (2024)
| M9 | 5310 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 141.3 mm | 132 mm | +9.3 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 57 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 13.1 mm | +3.4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M9 better than 5310 (2024)?
- Pixel density167 ppi vs 143 ppi+17%
Why is 5310 (2024) better than M9?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · M9: Yes
- Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
- Screen-to-body ratio21.4% vs 32.3%+51%
- Thickness16.5 mm vs 13.1 mm+26%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 131 g | — |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 13.1 mm |
| Height | 141.3 mm | 132 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 57 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | — |
| Colours | Black | White/Red, Black/Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.8″ |
| Panel | TFT | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 143 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 21.4% | 32.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | Unisoc 6531F |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| CPU cores | 1 | — |
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.008 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | ThreadX | — |
| Platform | Other | — |
| Interface | — | Series 30 |
