How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. M9 vs 220 4G (2024)

AGM M9 vs Nokia 220 4G (2024)

What M9 does better (1) and where 220 4G (2024) wins (5) — every spec side by side.

AGM M9
AGM · 2024M9
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ $55
Higher score
vs
Nokia 220 4G (2024)
Nokia · 2024220 4G (2024)
3.5Score
5 advantages≈ $45
2.0Display2.1
2.0Battery2.1
7.0Features3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

M9220 4G (2024)
59 × 141.316.554.2 × 127.311.6
M9220 4G (2024)Difference
Height141.3 mm127.3 mm+14 mm
Width59 mm54.2 mm+4.8 mm
Thickness16.5 mm11.6 mm+4.9 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is M9 better than 220 4G (2024)?

  1. Pixel density167 ppi vs 143 ppi+17%

Why is 220 4G (2024) better than M9?

  1. Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
  2. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · M9: Yes
  3. Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
  4. Screen-to-body ratio21.4% vs 35.2%+64%
  5. Thickness16.5 mm vs 11.6 mm+42%
Specifications

Side by side

AGM M9AGM M9≈ $554.2
Design
Weight131 g—
Thickness16.5 mm11.6 mm
Height141.3 mm127.3 mm
Width59 mm54.2 mm
Ingress protectionIP69—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx9—
ColoursBlackBlack, Peach
Display
Screen size2.4″2.8″
PanelTFTTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density167 ppi143 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio21.4%35.2%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T107Unisoc T107
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
Process—22 nm
CPU cores11
CPU frequency1 GHz1 GHz
Memory
RAM—0.062 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity1,000 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery type—Li-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth55
NFC—No
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
Features
Stereo speakers—No
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Sensors—No
Software
OS at launchThreadX—
PlatformOther—
Interface—Series 30
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare