How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. M9 vs 110 4G 2nd Edition

AGM M9 vs Nokia 110 4G 2nd Edition

What M9 does better (4) and where 110 4G 2nd Edition wins (3) — every spec side by side.

AGM M9
AGM · 2024M9
4.2Score
4 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
vs
Nokia 110 4G 2nd Edition
Nokia · 2025110 4G 2nd Edition
3.6Score
3 advantages≈ $50
2.0Display2.0
2.0Battery2.1
7.0Features3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

M9110 4G 2nd Edition
59 × 141.316.550 × 121.514.4
M9110 4G 2nd EditionDifference
Height141.3 mm121.5 mm+19.8 mm
Width59 mm50 mm+9 mm
Thickness16.5 mm14.4 mm+2.1 mm
Weight131 g94 g+36 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is M9 better than 110 4G 2nd Edition?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx42.2×
  2. Pixel density167 ppi vs 111 ppi+50%
  3. Screen size2.4″ vs 1.8″+33%
  4. Resolution (width)240 px vs 120 px2×

Why is 110 4G 2nd Edition better than M9?

  1. Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
  2. Weight131 g vs 94 g+39%
  3. Thickness16.5 mm vs 14.4 mm+15%
Specifications

Side by side

AGM M9AGM M9≈ $554.2
Design
Weight131 g94 g
Thickness16.5 mm14.4 mm
Height141.3 mm121.5 mm
Width59 mm50 mm
Ingress protectionIP69IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx9IPx4
ColoursBlack—
Display
Screen size2.4″1.8″
PanelTFTLCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px120 px
Resolution (height)320 px160 px
Pixel density167 ppi111 ppi
Screen-to-body ratio21.4%—
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T107—
Chip makerUnisoc—
CPU cores1—
CPU frequency1 GHz—
Memory
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera—0.1 MP
Rear cameras—1
Optical stabilisation—No
Ultra-wide camera—No
Telephoto camera—No
Battery
Battery capacity1,000 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery type—Li-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth55
USBUSB Type-C—
Features
3.5 mm headphone jackNo—
Software
OS at launchThreadXNokia Series 30+
PlatformOtherOther
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare