- dotrising.com
- Compare
- M9 vs 110 4G 2023
AGM M9 vs Nokia 110 4G 2023
What M9 does better (3) and where 110 4G 2023 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Features2.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
M9110 4G 2023
| M9 | 110 4G 2023 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 141.3 mm | 121.5 mm | +19.8 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 50 mm | +9 mm |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 14.4 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Weight | 131 g | 94 g | +36 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M9 better than 110 4G 2023?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx24.5×
- Screen size2.4″ vs 1.8″+33%
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 120 px2×
Why is 110 4G 2023 better than M9?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
- Weight131 g vs 94 g+39%
- Thickness16.5 mm vs 14.4 mm+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 131 g | 94 g |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 14.4 mm |
| Height | 141.3 mm | 121.5 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 50 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 1.8″ |
| Panel | TFT | Farb-Display |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 21.4% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | Unisoc T107 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| CPU cores | 1 | 1 |
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 0.08 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | ThreadX | Nokia Series 30+ |
| Platform | Other | Other |
