- dotrising.com
- Compare
- M9 vs 1880
AGM M9 vs Doro 1880
What M9 does better (3) and where 1880 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
M91880
| M9 | 1880 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 141.3 mm | 128 mm | +13.3 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 67 mm | −8 mm |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 13 mm | +3.5 mm |
| Weight | 131 g | 114 g | +17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M9 better than 1880?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx42.2×
- Dual SIMYes · 1880: No
- Screen-to-body ratio21.4% vs 20.9%+2%
Why is 1880 better than M9?
- Weight131 g vs 114 g+15%
- Thickness16.5 mm vs 13 mm+27%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 131 g | 114 g |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 13 mm |
| Height | 141.3 mm | 128 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 67 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black | Black, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT | TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 21.4% | 20.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | Unisoc |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| CPU cores | 1 | — |
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 0.3 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| Features | ||
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | ThreadX | Mocor OS |
| Platform | Other | Other |
