How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. M9 vs CORE-S5

AGM M9 vs Crosscall CORE-S5

What M9 does better (3) and where CORE-S5 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

AGM M9
AGM · 2024M9
4.2Score
3 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
vs
Crosscall CORE-S5
Crosscall · 2024CORE-S5
3.8Score
2 advantages≈ $80
2.0Display2.0
2.0Battery2.1
7.0Features4.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

M9CORE-S5
59 × 141.316.562 × 14014.7
M9CORE-S5Difference
Height141.3 mm140 mm+1.3 mm
Width59 mm62 mm−3 mm
Thickness16.5 mm14.7 mm+1.8 mm
Weight131 g146 g−15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is M9 better than CORE-S5?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx8+12%
  2. Weight131 g vs 146 g+11%
  3. Screen-to-body ratio21.4% vs 20.5%+4%

Why is CORE-S5 better than M9?

  1. Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,800 mAh+80%
  2. Thickness16.5 mm vs 14.7 mm+12%
Specifications

Side by side

AGM M9AGM M9≈ $554.2
Design
Weight131 g146 g
Thickness16.5 mm14.7 mm
Height141.3 mm140 mm
Width59 mm62 mm
Ingress protectionIP69IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx9IPx8
Glass protection—Gorilla Glass 3
ColoursBlackBlack
Display
Screen size2.4″2.4″
PanelTFTLCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density167 ppi167 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Peak brightness—400 nits
Screen-to-body ratio21.4%20.5%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T107Unisoc T127
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
CPU cores11
CPU frequency1 GHz—
Memory
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera—2 MP
Rear cameras—1
Optical stabilisation—No
Ultra-wide camera—No
Telephoto camera—No
Battery
Battery capacity1,000 mAh1,800 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth55
NFC—No
USBUSB Type-C—
Features
Stereo speakers—No
3.5 mm headphone jackNo—
Software
OS at launchThreadXMocor
PlatformOtherOther
EU label
Energy class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare