- dotrising.com
- Compare
- M9 vs SL230 LTE
AGM M9 vs Bea-Fon SL230 LTE
What M9 does better (3) and where SL230 LTE wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
M9SL230 LTE
| M9 | SL230 LTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 141.3 mm | 119 mm | +22.3 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 55 mm | +4 mm |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 12.6 mm | +3.9 mm |
| Weight | 131 g | 90 g | +41 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M9 better than SL230 LTE?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 800 mAh+25%
- Screen size2.4″ vs 1.8″+33%
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 128 px+88%
Why is SL230 LTE better than M9?
- Weight131 g vs 90 g+46%
- Thickness16.5 mm vs 12.6 mm+31%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 131 g | 90 g |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 12.6 mm |
| Height | 141.3 mm | 119 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 55 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 1.8″ |
| Panel | TFT | Farb-Display |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 128 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 21.4% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | — |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | — |
| CPU cores | 1 | — |
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 800 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| Features | ||
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | ThreadX | — |
| Platform | Other | — |
