How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. M6 vs 6310 (2024)

AGM M6 vs Nokia 6310 (2024)

What M6 does better (2) and where 6310 (2024) wins (4) — every spec side by side.

AGM M6
AGM · 2024M6
4.0Score
2 advantages≈ $70
Higher score
vs
Nokia 6310 (2024)
Nokia · 20246310 (2024)
3.5Score
4 advantages≈ $75
2.0Display2.2
2.2Battery2.1
5.4Features3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

M66310 (2024)
61.9 × 14219.856 × 135.514.1
M66310 (2024)Difference
Height142 mm135.5 mm+6.5 mm
Width61.9 mm56 mm+5.9 mm
Thickness19.8 mm14.1 mm+5.7 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is M6 better than 6310 (2024)?

  1. Battery capacity2,500 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+72%
  2. Pixel density167 ppi vs 143 ppi+17%

Why is 6310 (2024) better than M6?

  1. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · M6: Yes
  2. Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
  3. Screen-to-body ratio20.3% vs 32%+58%
  4. Thickness19.8 mm vs 14.1 mm+40%
Specifications

Side by side

AGM M6AGM M6≈ $704.0
Design
Weight195 g—
Thickness19.8 mm14.1 mm
Height142 mm135.5 mm
Width61.9 mm56 mm
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
ColoursBlackBlack, Green
Display
Screen size2.4″2.8″
PanelFarb-DisplayTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density167 ppi143 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio20.3%32%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T107Unisoc 6531F
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
CPU cores1—
CPU frequency1 GHz—
Memory
RAM—0.008 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera0.3 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Telephoto cameraNo—
Battery
Battery capacity2,500 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery type—Li-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth5.15
NFC—No
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
USB version2—
Features
Stereo speakersNoNo
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Software
Interface—Series 30
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare