How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. M6 vs 225 4G (2024)

AGM M6 vs Nokia 225 4G (2024)

What M6 does better (1) and where 225 4G (2024) wins (4) — every spec side by side.

AGM M6
AGM · 2024M6
4.0Score
1 advantage≈ $65
Higher score
vs
Nokia 225 4G (2024)
Nokia · 2024225 4G (2024)
3.6Score
4 advantages≈ $80
2.0Display2.1
3.0Camera3.0
2.2Battery2.1
5.4Features3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

M6225 4G (2024)
61.9 × 14219.852 × 121.511.6
M6225 4G (2024)Difference
Height142 mm121.5 mm+20.5 mm
Width61.9 mm52 mm+9.9 mm
Thickness19.8 mm11.6 mm+8.2 mm
Weight195 g90 g+105 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is M6 better than 225 4G (2024)?

  1. Battery capacity2,500 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+72%

Why is 225 4G (2024) better than M6?

  1. Weight195 g vs 90 g2.2×
  2. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · M6: Yes
  3. Thickness19.8 mm vs 11.6 mm+71%
  4. Screen-to-body ratio20.3% vs 28.2%+39%
Specifications

Side by side

AGM M6AGM M6≈ $654.0
Design
Weight195 g90 g
Thickness19.8 mm11.6 mm
Height142 mm121.5 mm
Width61.9 mm52 mm
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
ColoursBlackPink, Dark Blue
Display
Screen size2.4″2.4″
PanelFarb-DisplayTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density167 ppi167 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio20.3%28.2%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T107Unisoc T107
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
Process—22 nm
CPU cores11
CPU frequency1 GHz1 GHz
Memory
RAM—0.062 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera0.3 MP0.3 MP
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity2,500 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery type—Li-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth5.15
NFC—No
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
USB version22
Features
Stereo speakersNoNo
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Sensors—No
Software
Interface—Series 30
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare